## Speed Disparities in Blockchain Networks
A recent report by Phoenix Group, released on August 6, 2023, has shed light on the dramatic speed differences across major blockchain networks. Sui and Internet Computer Protocol (ICP) have emerged as the frontrunners in terms of transactions per second (TPS), showcasing impressive performance metrics that outpace not just other emerging platforms but also the legacy chains that have been leading the market for years.
### Sui and ICP: Leaders in TPS
According to the data, Sui recorded an astonishing average of **3,900 TPS**, while ICP closely followed with **3,700 TPS**. These figures put them head and shoulders above their competitors, with the next closest contender, Base, registering merely **105.3 TPS**. Other notable mentions include Solana and BNB Chain, which logged **92.1 TPS** and a yet unspecified lower figure, respectively. The significant performance gap between these high-speed networks and others indicates a shift towards ultra-fast transactional capabilities in the blockchain space.
### Swift Finality Times
In addition to high TPS, Sui and ICP also boasted quick block finality times. Sui achieved an average of **398 milliseconds**, while ICP recorded **480 milliseconds**. These rapid rates allow for quicker transaction settlements when compared with traditional blockchain networks like Bitcoin, which has an average block time of **10 minutes**, and Ethereum, which maintains a block time of **12 seconds**. Such efficiency is pivotal for applications requiring swift confirmation times, like decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and gaming.
—
## Legacy Networks Lagging Behind
Despite their established presence, older blockchain networks are falling short in speed rankings. For instance, Ethereum averaged a mere **11.3 TPS**. Other legacy chains, including Avalanche, Cardano, and Bitcoin, performed even worse, ranging from **11.2 TPS** down to Bitcoin’s disappointing **4.4 TPS**. This slow performance illustrates the ongoing debate between decentralization and scalability that often hampers older blockchain technologies.
The analysis included a diverse array of blockchain ecosystems, portraying variability in transaction performance. This diversity highlights the technical differences and transaction handling mechanisms that various networks employ, indicating that there is not a one-size-fits-all solution in blockchain technology.
—
## Adoption Gaps Despite High Performance
Even with top-tier speed, both Sui and ICP suffer from low active address counts, which raises questions about user adoption. Sui recorded **65,900 active addresses**, while ICP had just **31,300**. This stands in stark contrast to networks like BNB Chain, which boasts a massive **45.6 million** active addresses, followed by Solana with **16.1 million** and Ethereum with **1.4 million**. Notably, Bitcoin also maintains a healthy **840,000** active addresses.
These statistics strongly suggest a disconnect between performance capabilities and actual user engagement on platforms like Sui and ICP. While they lead in TPS, the low numbers of active addresses indicate that potential users are yet to fully embrace these promising technologies. This dichotomy points to the ongoing challenge for blockchain networks: how to turn impressive performance into real-world usage and adoption.
—
## Understanding Transaction Speed in Context
It’s essential to recognize that transaction speed is not the sole determinant of a blockchain’s success or its usability in the wider ecosystem. Despite Sui and ICP’s impressive TPS figures, their relatively low user activity illustrates that achieving high speed is only one aspect of a network’s overall viability. Blockchain projects must not only focus on improving their throughput but also work on strategies that enhance user experience, community engagement, and ecosystem integration.
High TPS figures capture attention, but they do not guarantee traction in the market. The crypto space is rich with complexities that require a multi-faceted approach to community building and platform usability. Understanding this landscape is vital for new and existing blockchain technologies as they navigate a rapidly evolving environment.
—